#1

What makes HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim better Choice

Display Clarity 401 ppi 386 ppi
HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim has 3.89% higher screen resolution than Samsung Galaxy A8.
#2

What makes Samsung Galaxy A8 better Choice

Screen Size 5.5 inches (Screen to Body Ratio: 67.03%) 5.7 inches (Screen to Body Ratio: 73.82%)
Samsung Galaxy A8 has 3.64% bigger screen size.
Primary Camera Resolution 13.0 MP 16.0 MP
Samsung Galaxy A8 has 23.08% higher primary camera resolution.
Secondary Camera Resolution 4.0 MP 5.0 MP
Samsung Galaxy A8 has 25.00% higher front camera resolution.
Internal Storage 16 GB 32 GB
Samsung Galaxy A8 has 100.00% more internal memory.
Quick Charging No Yes
Samsung Galaxy A8 has Quick Charging, whereas HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim doesn't.
Processor Speed 1500 1700
Samsung Galaxy A8 has 13.33% faster processor speed.

Feature Comparison of HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim Vs Samsung Galaxy A8

Important Dates
Release Date November 25, 2015
India Availability December 14, 2015 August 01, 2015
General
Sim Support Dual Sim, NaNo-SIM, GSM + GSM Dual Sim, GSM + GSM
Phone Dimensions 157.7 x 78.89 x 7.99 mm 158 x 76.8 x 5.9 mm
Phone Weight 148 grams 151 grams
Keypad Touch Touch
Display
Screen Size 5.5 inches (Screen to Body Ratio: 67.03%) 5.7 inches (Screen to Body Ratio: 73.82%)
Screen Resolution 1920 x 1080 Pixels, 401 ppi 1080 x 1920 Pixels, 386 ppi
Screen Type Super LCD, With 16 M Colors Super AMOLED, With 16 M Colors
Touch Type Capacitive With Multitouch Capacitive With Multitouch
Screen Protection Corning Gorilla Glass 4
Photo & Video
Camera Yes, 13.0 Megapixel Yes, 16.0 Megapixel
Flash Yes, LED flash Yes, Single LED Flash
Front Camera Yes, 4.0 Megapixel Yes, 5.0 Megapixel
Camera Features Rear (Auto Focus, BSI Sensor, Optical Image Stabilization), Front (HTC UltraPixel, 0.33 inch sensor size, 2.0 micron pixel size, BSI Sensor, F/2.0 Aperture, Upto 80 degrees viewing angle 26.8 mm wide angle lens), 1080p Video Recording, Geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, HDR, Panorama, Self timer. Auto Focus, Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, High Dynamic Range (HDR)
Video Recording Yes, 1080p at 30 fps Yes, 1080 x 1920 Pixels at 30 fps
Front Flash No
Technical
Operating System Android 5.1 - Lollipop Android 5.1 - Lollipop
Processor 1.5 GHz , MediaTek MT6753 Octa Core 1.8 GHz , Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 64-Bit Octa Core
RAM 2 GB 2 GB
GPU (Graphics) ARM Mali-T720 MP3, 700 MHz Qualcomm Adreno 405
User Interface HTC Sense Samsung Touchwiz
Battery
Battery 2800 mAh, Li-ion 3050 mAh, Li-ion (Non-removable)
Battery Standby Up to 304 Hours
Battery Talk Time Up to 20 Hours
Connectivity
GPRS Yes Yes
EDGE Yes Yes
3G Yes, HSDPA, 7.2 Mbps; HSUPA, 5.76 Mbps Yes, HSDPA, 42.2 Mbps; HSUPA, 5.76 Mbps
4G Yes, LTE, Cat4, 50 Mbps UL, 150 Mbps DL Yes, LTE, Cat4, 50 Mbps UL, 150 Mbps DL
Wi-Fi Yes, with Tethering Yes, with Tethering
USB Connectivity Yes, micro-USB 2.0 (5-Pin) Connector Yes, microUSB v2.0
GPS Yes, with A-GPS Support, GLONASS Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS
Bluetooth Yes, v4.1 with A2DP Yes, v4.1
External Display Connectivity Wifi Direct Wifi Direct
Support NFC Yes
Multimedia
E-mail Yes, with Push E-mail Yes, with Push E-mail
Document Reader Yes Yes
FM Radio Yes Yes
Alert Types Vibration, MP3, WAV Vibration, MP3, WAV
PDF Reader Yes Yes
Memory
Phonebook Memory Practically Unlimited Contacts Practically Unlimited Contacts
Internal Storage 16 GB 32 GB
Expandable Memory microSDXC, upto 2 TB microSD, upto 128 GB
Other Features
Sensors Ambient light Sensor, Distance sensor, Accelerometer, Compass, Magnetic Sensor, Sensor Center Accelerometer, Proximity, Geomagnetic, Light, Fingerprint Sensor
Quick Charging No Yes
Speaker Quality HTC BoomSound using Dolby Audio
Additional Features HTC Sense 6.0 UI, HTC Eye Experience, HTC BlinkFeed, HTC Themes ANT+ Support, Qualcomm Quick Charge 2.0

More about

Compare HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim Vs Samsung Galaxy A8 side by side for all differences and similarities in specifications and features to find which is better. HTC Desire 828 Dual Sim has a feature score of 83, whereas Samsung Galaxy A8 has a feature score of 83. The page was last updated on September 19, 2019.