#1

What makes Motorola Droid Turbo better Choice

Primary Camera Resolution 16.0 MP 21 MP
Moto Turbo has 31.25% higher primary camera resolution.
Internal Storage 32 GB 64 GB
Moto Turbo has 100.00% more internal memory.
Display Clarity 401 ppi 565 ppi
Moto Turbo has 40.90% higher screen resolution than Samsung Galaxy S6 Plus.
User Interface Samsung Touchwiz Moto UI
Moto Turbo runs on Moto UI Which has faster update cycle, because of which it receives updates faster and more consistently than Samsung Galaxy S6 Plus running on Samsung Touchwiz.
External Display Connectivity Wifi Direct Wifi Direct, DLNA
Moto Turbo has Wifi Direct, DLNA and Samsung Galaxy S6 Plus has Wifi Direct.
Processor Speed 2100 2500
Moto Turbo has 19.05% faster processor speed.
#2

What makes Samsung Galaxy S6 Plus better Choice

Screen Size 5.5 inches 5.2 inches (Screen to Body Ratio: 70.87%)
Samsung Galaxy S6 Plus has 5.77% bigger screen size.
Secondary Camera Resolution 5.0 MP 2 MP
Samsung Galaxy S6 Plus has 150.00% higher front camera resolution.
RAM 4 GB 3 GB
Samsung Galaxy S6 Plus has 33.33% more RAM.

Feature Comparison of Samsung Galaxy S6 Plus Vs Moto Turbo

General
Sim Support Single Sim, NaNo-SIM, GSM Single Sim, NaNo-SIM, GSM
Keypad Touch Touch
Phone Dimensions 143.5 x 73.3 x 8.3 mm
Phone Weight 169 grams
SAR Value 1.39 W/kg (head) 0.50 W/kg (body)
Display
Screen Size 5.5 inches 5.2 inches (Screen to Body Ratio: 70.87%)
Screen Resolution 1080 x 1920 Pixels, 401 ppi 1440 x 2560 Pixels, 565 ppi
Screen Type Super AMOLED, Curved Edge Screen, With 16 M Colors SUPER AMOLED, With 16 M Colors
Touch Type Capacitive With Multitouch Capacitive With Multitouch
Screen Protection Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Photo & Video
Camera Yes, 16.0 Megapixel Yes, 21 Megapixel
Flash Yes, Single LED Flash Yes, Dual LED Flash
Front Camera Yes, 5.0 Megapixel Yes, 2 Megapixel
Camera Features Geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, Auto HDR, panorama, autofocus Geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, panorama, HDR, autofocus
Video Recording Yes, 2160 x 3840 Pixels at 30 fps Yes, 2160 x 3840 Pixels at 24 fps
Front Flash No
Technical
Operating System Android 5.0.2 - Lollipop Android 5.0 - Lollipop
Processor 2.1 GHz , Samsung Exynos 7 7420 Octa-Core 2.7 GHz , Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 8084 64-Bit Quad Core
RAM 4 GB 3 GB
GPU (Graphics) ARM Mali-T760 MP8, 772 MHz Adreno 420
User Interface Samsung Touchwiz Moto UI
Battery
Battery 3000 mAh, Li-po (Non-removable) 3900 mAh, Li-po (Non-removable)
Battery Standby Up to 675 hrs (3G)
Battery Talk Time Up to 48 hrs (3G)
Connectivity
GPRS Yes Yes
EDGE Yes Yes
3G Yes, HSDPA, 42.2 Mbps; HSUPA, 5.76 Mbps Yes
4G Yes, LTE, Cat4, 50 Mbps UL, 150 Mbps DL Yes, LTE, Cat4, 150 Mbps DL, 50 Mbps UL
Wi-Fi Yes, with Tethering Yes, with Tethering
USB Connectivity Yes, microUSB v2.0, USB Host Yes, microUSB v2.0
GPS Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS
Bluetooth Yes, v4.1 Yes, v4.0
Support NFC Yes Yes
External Display Connectivity Wifi Direct Wifi Direct, DLNA
Multimedia
E-mail Yes, with Push E-mail Yes, with Push E-mail
Document Reader Yes
FM Radio No No
Alert Types Vibration, MP3, WAV Vibration, MP3 ringtones, WAV
PDF Reader Yes
Memory
Phonebook Memory practically unlimited contacts Practically Unlimmited contacts
Internal Storage 32 GB 64 GB
Expandable Memory microSD, upto 128 GB
Other Features
Sensors Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass
Quick Charging Yes Yes
Additional Features OneDrive (115 GB cloud storage), Smart stay, ANT+ support, Wireless charging (Qi/PMA), Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified), Fingerprint sensor (PayPal certified), S-Voice natural language commands and dictation Fast battery charging: 60% in 30 min (Quick Charge 2.0),Wireless charging (Qi-enabled),Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic,Voice memo/dial/commands

More about

Compare Samsung Galaxy S6 Plus Vs Moto Turbo side by side for all differences and similarities in specifications and features to find which is better. Samsung Galaxy S6 Plus has a feature score of 0, whereas Moto Turbo has a feature score of 88. The page was last updated on October 19, 2019.